The story of Reid and Riley in Born or Bred takes place in a world where the few with power control what they expect from the many. Part of that expectation revolves around how people should look and act, what they do for work and where they should live.
When I drafted my young adult novel, I decided that the rulers in my fictional world (Cora and Claire, aka The Guardians) would have control over others beyond the boundaries of what I would consider reasonable. This would include control over reproduction and genetics, as well as freewill and movement. Until recently, I had to guess what it would feel like to have these individual rights taken away. However, the recent time spent dealing with the pandemic definitely gave me a taste of what it’s like to lose control over free movement.
As I began to build the world in my story, I thought about what I would find most intrusive when it comes to control over citizens. The following are questions I thought about as I wrote the story of Reid and Riley, as well as information related to research I discovered along the way.
What would the world be like if we were told we couldn’t have children, at all, unless they were genetically enhanced?
What if babies were born only after DNA editing was used as a way to create what some might call ‘designer babies?’ There’s much to debate over this possibility, which has its own list of pros and cons. But as of today, is the idea of designer babies the thing of science fiction or have doctors gone rogue in their attempt to build a “baby-designing business?” Would the world find it acceptable to allow doctors and scientists to offer “genetic upgrades” to parents willing to pay the cost of such an “upgrade?”
The Guardians, who are also twins, have certain requirements as rulers, which you can find here. The third rule on that list mandates that parents cannot reproduce unless they undergo DNA editing to guarantee genetic enhancement. The reason for this directive has a lot to do with the past of both the antagonists, and was born out of fear but morphed into keeping power over society as a whole. Even though I already had my mind set that my antagonists would require DNA editing, I researched the topic to see how close, or far we were from the possibility. The above articles as well as others I reviewed during my research on the topic were interesting and also eye-opening.
What if DNA editing was used as a means to prevent genetic disease?
Would that warrant regular use of DNA editing and reduce moral and ethical limitations? Should scientists be allowed to change DNA to prevent genetic disease by replacing defective DNA? And should scientists be allowed to “tinker” with human DNA if they believe they can avoid introducing harmful mutations?
All that may be well and good, but my antagonists decided to tighten the noose when it came to control of reproduction in order to limit disease and mental health disorders. Which was added to the story due to my next question…
What if parents weren’t allowed to reproduce, at all, if it’s learned they have certain predisposed conditions, a history of mental health or neurological issues or a criminal background?
This is a requirement mandated by the rulers in Born or Bred; although the female parent is allowed to carry an embryo from another that has undergone DNA editing. I’ve heard the offhand remark someone might make about a parent and how they shouldn’t be allowed to have babies for one reason or another. The flippant remark may be made and the person making the remark might believe it, but for someone in power to actually have the right to tell us whether or not we can have children is extremely intrusive. Which is why it was added to the list of rules society must abide by in my novel.
Of course, not everyone will follow the rules, right? Some parents are going to have babies without DNA editing, even if they are susceptible to certain diseases or mental health disorders or have criminal backgrounds. So what happens then? This led to my next question…
What if parents had babies against the rules and experienced the worst case scenario due to their actions?
In Born or Bred, families who go against the rules will pay the ultimate price, which is to have their child taken away from them. In current times, children are removed from the home when their safety is at risk because of the actions of the parents. In my novel, children are removed because The Guardians believe the children will someday be the safety risk. The antagonists in my novel have a certain belief that any child born to someone with a mental health disorder or a criminal background are more than likely to end up like their parents and later present the same behavior. In order to protect society, as they see it, they have to remove the risk.
Is it fair to believe a child will turn out a certain way, just because the natural parents have certain disorders or committed acts of violent crime? I researched the idea related to whether mental health disorders are linked by genetic traits because the main concern would be whether mental health disorders are hereditary While many disorders have a hereditary component, there are also other factors to consider, such as the social and physical environmental elements and how the child will be influenced by them.
And what about criminal behavior? Is this trait inherited or learned over time? One of the reasons behind my title: is this type of behavior BORN or BRED? I touched on this subject in my last post, The Study of Twins and Nature versus Nurture, as it relates to twins but it can relate to any child born to parents with a particular set of traits. I don’t believe experts in the field will ever completely agree on the answer when it comes to nature versus nurture. Not only am I curious about what traits (good or bad) a child might inherit from their parents, I was especially curious about whether twins would end up with similar traits even after they were separated at birth. The findings about some real-life twins is pretty extraordinary and you can read about them in my study of twins post.
We can’t control who we’re born to, which led me to my next question…
What if babies were labeled at birth and treated differently the rest of their lives based on their DNA… something they had no control over when they are born?
Plenty of individuals are treated differently based on something they have no control over: the color of their skin, their sex, where they were raised, or the actions of their own parents. Later in life individuals are treated differently based on traits they have no control over (such as mental health disorders, physical appearance) and behavior many would argue can be controlled (such as substance abuse, criminal behavior).
When I wrote Born or Bred, I wondered what it might be like if those in charge could decide to slap a “bad egg” label on a baby specifically because of its DNA, should the parents refuse DNA editing. Is that something individuals have to be concerned with during current times? I know that insurance companies and employers are not allowed to discriminate against an individual when it comes to genetic information. There’s the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 to remind them of that fact.
That act relates to insurance and employers, which might appear to cover the most important aspects of our lives. But when I researched the topic, I was surprised to find an article from 2016 about a school accused of genetic discrimination when they allegedly excluded a student because of his DNA. Apparently, the school learned that the student carried genetic markers for cystic fibrosis and later the parents of two siblings who suffered from the condition were concerned about the children attending the same school together because of the greater chances of spreading infection. Although the student in question didn’t actually suffer from the condition and wasn’t a risk, the school asked the student to leave anyway. DNA discrimination is real but not often heard about, but I decided to make it a key component in my story.
And finally, last but not least, one of the questions I had when I wrote my novel involved our movements, or more specifically, the ability for others to track our movements…
What if citizens were required to receive an implant so that every person could be tracked and accounted for? And what if implants were necessary to avoid being forced out of society?
You have to admit we’re all being tracked in some way already…personally with our phones, the GPS in our vehicles, other devices we use, and capturing us when we move about with cameras that are ever watchful from street corners to bridges and business buildings to private residences.
But what if those in power required their citizens to be tracked with an implant? That’s what my antagonists in Born or Bred have made law and while a citizen can refuse, their status will change to that of a radical and they will no longer be allowed to live in the city where they are safe inside the walls.
My story was going to include implants either way, but I was curious about where we are currently in the science behind the possibility of implants. What I found surprised me, was somewhat interesting and also concerning.
There are many arguments for and against implants. Some examples of why people might believe implants to be a good thing would include keeping track of children in case they wander off or are kidnapped and to track the elderly who suffer from dementia who might wander off and need to be found quickly.
Some companies have already made use of placing microchips in their employees, both here in the United States and also in Sweden. The U.S. company hasn’t stopped there and has continued to work on additional ways they might be able to make use of microchips.
The idea of implants might seem like fiction, but it has become somewhat of a reality and it makes many wonder whether microchips are our future. In my novel, implants are definitely a reality but I decided to take it even further than just a way for The Guardians to keep track of the citizens. I added an element to this issue which includes a real danger when someone else has control of a foreign object inside your body.
Those are some of the “what if” questions I had as I was plotting the story of Reid & Riley and Cora & Claire in Born or Bred. These “what if” questions are what made writing my novel and the research behind it even more interesting, because the topics have a mixture of both truth and fiction.